Tuesday, June 30, 2009

Hibakusha: the amazing Atomic Bomb Survivors







As part of the travel portion of our course, we had the opportunity to meet and hear the amazing stories of the Japanese "Hibakusha". The Hibakusha, "Atomic Bomb Survivors" are the people who were affected by the atomic bombs dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki by the United States towards the end of the Second World War. Most Hibakusha are Japanese, although some are Koreans who were drafted into the Japanese military during the war.

We had the opportunity to meet two of these survivors who have managed to transform horrifying, tragic events into powerful stories that help others to fully understand the horrors of war and the power of love and peace.

If you have not had the opportunity to explore or research the amazing stories of the Japanese Hibakusha, please make time to do. They are truly amazing stories of amazing people.

Discrimination in Japan...

If you are like many of us foreigners, you might have assumed that a homogenous country such as Japan, might not have to manage issues of race and discrimination. Indeed, Japan has a population of 127,288,416. That is, 99.4% of Japan’s population are Japanese. However, while Japan is predominantly comprised of ethnic Japanese citizens, Japan is a multi-ethnic nation comprised of various other ethnic minority groups such Koreans, Chinese, Taiwanese, Brazilians, Ainu, Buraku etc. Historically, these ethnic minority groups have had a difficult time living and existing within Japanese society. Women and sexual minorities are the subject of discriminatory treatment in Japan as well.

Japan is known for being a closed society with tough immigration laws that discourage migration to the country. Racial discrimination and xenophobia do indeed exist in Japan. The law prohibits discrimination on basis of race, gender, disability, language, and social status. Although the government generally enforced these provisions, discrimination against women, ethnic minorities and foreigners remained (Bureau of Democracy, 2009). The effects of discrimination are felt be many racial and minority groups in Japan including the Buraku people, the Ainu, the people of Okinawa, people from former Japanese colonies such as the Koreans, Chinese, and their descendants, other foreigners, and migrant workers who have come from all over Asia (IMADR, 2009). While there are laws that prohibit racial discrimination, the country’s large populations of Korean, Chinese, and Philipino residents were subject to deeply entrenched societal discrimination (Bureau of Democracy, 2009).

This discrimination often takes the form of restricted access to housing, education, and employment opportunities. The Human Rights Watch Report also cited a widespread perception among citizens that these Japan born ethnic “foreigners” were responsible for most of the crimes committed in Japan. This misperception persists despite empirical data presented by the Ministry of Justice showing that crimes committed by “foreigners” was statistically lower than the crime rates of Japanese citizens. Indigenous peoples such as the Ainu and Okinawans faced the same patterns of discrimination as other ethnic minorities (McNeil, 2006).

Japan is also charged with protecting and preserving the human rights of Japanese women. With respect to the various issues surrounding women’s rights, Japan has generally provided women with the same rights as men. However, despite these efforts problems persist. The law criminalizes all forms of rape, including spousal rape. Although the number of reported rape cases were significantly less than those reported in 2007, there were still 747 reported rape cases during the first half or 2008 (Bureau of Democracy, 2009).

Domestic violence against women and sexual harassment in the workplace remained problems as well. In 2007, the Ministry of Health, Labor, and Welfare received 15,799 reports of sexual harassment. Laws protecting women from sexual harassment include measures to identify companies that failed to prevent sexual harassment, but does not include tangible, punitive measures to enforce compliance other than publicizing the names of offending companies (MHLW, 2009). Additionally, women in Japan continue to encounter discrimination in employment with women earning less than two thirds of the monthly salary earned by men (MHLW, 2009).

The groping of women in public, particularly in subway cars, continues to be a problem as well. In Japan, more than 4,000 men are arrested each year for groping on public transport (Herbert, 2004). This prompted a number of government interventions such as police crackdowns, increased police presence in subway cars, and the introduction of “women only” carriages during peak hours.

Japan also has challenges regarding the treatment of sexual minorities.
Compared to other countries, Japan is more accepting of its sexual minorities. Nevertheless, they face many issues of discrimination because of their chosen lifestyle. Many sexual minorities believe that Japanese society does not accept them as an equal members. According to one study conducted at the University of California San Francisco, sexual minorities experience ostracism as well as bullying via physical, verbal and psychological abuse. Additionally, they face discrimination at school, work, in their personal lives as well as in housing as many landlord refuse to rent to them.

Sexual minorities do not enjoy the same rights as heterosexuals as same-sex marriages are not allowed. Most sexual minorities choose to keep their sexual preference hidden at work and at school. They feel that to be "out" at school or at work exposes them openly to ridicule and decreased opportunities for employment. Much like Korean residents and other members of the Buraku community, sexual minorities in Japan find it easier to pass themselves off as "normal".

As we have studied and discussed as part of this class, Japan is positioned quite nicely to be the catalyst for great change and a model for other nations, particularly the Asian countries. It’s pacifist Constitution, Article 9, economic position in the World, status as a “World super-power” etc. potentially give Japan a moral foothold to advance ideas and concepts regarding world peace.

However, like so many other great nations, Japan must continue examining it's domestic human rights policies if they want to preserve their “honorable place in world”.

Re-uniting with our Japanese family...



When my wife was a child she participated in a foreign exchange program and spent eight months living and studying in Japan. Since her return to the U.S., she had only talked to her Japanese sister once and hadn't seen her in more than twenty years.

During our visit to Japan, my wife and I had the opportunity to connect with her foreign exchange host family. Here we are eating at a Chinese restaurant in a Tokyo suburb. What beautiful people! We had such a great time!

Dinner with friends...







Here we are in another Tokyo suburb having dinner with friends.
These are my friends who came to Los Angeles 5 years ago to study English.
Here we are havind dinner in their home with their parents.
We had such a wonderful time.
Good food, great company...and oh...lots of Japanese beer and sake!!

Friday, June 26, 2009

Japan United For Ministry of Peace

One of the dynamics we were exposed to during this course is the immense number of organizations and institutions working for global peace. JUMP is one of those organizations.

JUMP, Japan United For Ministry of Peace, founded by Yumi Kikuchi, is an organization of individual citizens, whose main goal is to bring about a lasting and sustainable peace by establishing a Ministry for Peace across all of Japan.

A Ministry of Peace, referred to in the United States as a Department of Peace, is a specific governmental institution that assesses governmental policy and legal decisions, on national, as well as international level, and then suggests alternatives based on the Culture of Peace, rather than economic gain or strategic / military power.

As defined by the United Nations, the Culture of Peace is a set of values, attitudes, modes of behaviour and ways of life that reject violence and prevent conflicts by tackling their root causes to solve problems through dialogue and negotiation among individuals, groups and nations (UN Resolutions A/RES/52/13 : Culture of Peace and A/RES/53/243, Declaration and Programme of Action on a Culture of Peace).

The structure and design of a Ministry or Department of Peace is one that would not only establish a formal Department of Peace, but that would also create a Secretary of Peace position, appointed by the President of the United States, who would among many things, hold the cultivation of peace as a strategic national policy objective and work closely with the President and other lawmakers to advance this objective via domestic and foreign policy initiatives.

The Department of Peace would also look to establish an Office of Peace Education and Training that would carry out the functions of the Department relative to the development and implementation of peace education training at the elementary, secondary, university, and postgraduate levels, including the development of a Peace Academy.

One of the most vocal advocates for a Department of Peace here in the United States is Congressman Dennis Kucinich who has been a strong advocate for peace and meaningful reform towards that end in U.S. national and foreign policy.

JUMP, as organization seeking to develop a Ministry of Peace in Japan, shares the basic mission and vision of numerous other independent organizations that seek to establish a Department of Peace with their home countries.

JUMP is also one of the founding members of the Global Alliance for Ministries and Departments of Peace, a community of individuals and organizations working within their respective countries to establish ministries or departments of peace.

The Global Alliance regularly hosts annual international conferences for current and potential members to encourage program growth and to address relevant global issues.

JUMP has an active voice in the Article 9 debate - the spirited debate over preserving or removing the clause in Japan's pacific constitution that prohibits maintaining a standing army as well as the use of military force to resolve international disputes. JUMP is an advocate for Article 9 preservation locally in Japan, but also supports the international, Global Article 9 Campaign holding Article 9 as a broad mechanism for peace and the shared property of the world.

Additionally they work to advocate for and to recognize the relevance that the cultivation of peace has on human rights, disarmament, nuclear weapons abolition, conflict prevention, development, the environment, etc.

JUMP is a strong advocate for developing self-sustaining communities, protecting the environment, corporate social responsibility, minimizing the effects of globalization, UN reform and other global issues.

Wednesday, May 27, 2009

Japan should become a champion of human rights

I am at a point where I am starting to collect resources for my chapter in the Wikibook that our group will be creating and I came across this very interesting press release by Human Rights Watch. http://tinyurl.com/pvfe3s


It written by a Japanese National who is a consultant with the organization. He comments largely about how Japan is positioned to be a leader in Asia in the area of human rights, but it needs to continue working towards addressing human rights issues in Japan and to speak out more firmly against the human rights violations of other countries. The author also comments that Japan's greatest challenge to its human rights record is overcoming the atrocities during WWII. Examples of such atrocities are the Nanking Massacre, Unit 731, and the Japanese "comfort women".

I also added a few links that will help you explore these Japanese war crimes
http://tinyurl.com/rtn34

videos:
http://tinyurl.com/qyfn5e
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bAp8bSdE5MQ&feature=related

(warning: very graphic video on Unit 731 human experiments)
http://tinyurl.com/oz6n67



Tuesday, May 26, 2009

Article 9: Why revise?

I have recently began exploring the issues surrounding the debate regarding the proposed revisions of Article 9 of the Japanese Constitution. What an interesting issue with broad implications for the people of Japan, their national pride and their political presence on the world stage.

Briefly, Article 9 of the Japanese Constitution prohibits the use of force as a means of settling international disputes. It also prohibits Japan from maintaining an army, navy or air force. Japan does have a Self Defense Force which is not considered an army, navy or air force. They are seen as extensions of the national police force and are used primarily to maintain law and order within Japan. http://tinyurl.com/Article-9-debate

Since the late 1990s, there has been much debate over Article 9. Largely because as it is constructed today, it limits and/or prohibits Japan's involvement in multilateral military commitments overseas. The United States particularly has urged Japan to take a larger role in the war on terror, which Article 9 prohibits. Additionally, Japan has been urged by various human rights organizations to assume a larger role in addressing human rights violations like those occurring in Sri Lanka. http://tinyurl.com/qlm6e7

More broadly, Japan has been called on to support various UN Security Council efforts to combat terror and/or address various human rights issues around the world that today are forbidden by Article 9's prohibition of use of force to do so. Article 9 supporters would like to see revisions made that would allow for Japan's involvement in multilateral commitments with other UN member states. Article 9 revisions would also allow Japan to maintain and utilize the Self Defense Force to protect against those who would aggressively move against Japan.

I welcome your thoughts. What do you think?